PROPOSAL
To avoid having messy the things of your desktop it is proposed to design and build a desktop organizer.
CONDITIONS
1.- It must allow to order and to accommodate different elements of the desk.
2.- It should have a limited size to avoid making your desktop useless
3.- It must contain three distinct spaces at least.
EVALUATION
Creativity and originalityAesthetics
Compliance with conditions
Robustness and finish.
Workgroup
SOME SOLUTIONS FOUND BY OTHER COLLEAGUE.
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF PROJECT MEMORY
1.- Cover
Includes Name of the project, an image (optional), authors, group, school and date
2.- Table of Contents
With the number pages (it must be done at the end).
3.- Proposal and conditions of the problem.
Information about what problem we propose to solve (this text has been given by the teacher)
4.- Individual designs and solutions.
After searching the information, each component of the group draw a sketch that should be incorporated into the memory.
5.- Final group design.
After a group discussion the final design will be defined. It can be one of the individual solution or a combination of ideas and improvements from other different .
The final design have to include: drawing in views (front and side view) or a perspective drawing of the solution. The drawing must be coloured and with the 3 dimensions (height, width and depth). Furthermore, every different element that compose it have be numbered.
6.- Disassembled product.
Each individual part can be identified with her shape and dimensions
7.- List of materials and tools.
8.- Memory of construction.
You have to describe what you have done to build the solution: the order followed, the difficulties encountered, the solutions founds, and the time spent . To do this, you will use the information collected in the class diary.
9.- Evaluation of the project and the work of the group
You must to answer some questions relate to:
The product: Does the designed solution work? Is it tough? What would you change if you had to make it again?
The group work: Has the working group worked well? Has the division of labor been equitable?
PRINTING VERSION
PRINTING VERSION
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario